🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.